I’ve been reading a lot about this subject lately, as it is easy to find by just typing in the keywords on a search engine. But the main reason I keep doing searches on the shale boom is because I’m always looking for good economic news, and the shale boom offers at least some faint hope for the fragile economy. Not only can this boom produce sorely needed jobs, but also has already made significant headway in decreasing our dependence on foreign energy. All I have to do is mention two words: “North Dakota”. North Dakota, of course, is the epicenter of the energy boom here, and is a flourishing oasis in a job market that still resembles the Sahara Desert. The boom there has been compared to the California gold rush of the mid nineteenth century, and what were once small, lonely prairie towns are growing into small cities centered on this energy revival. If all goes well, North Dakota is a symbol of hope and the future of our country as a whole. And there are other areas that are rich in shale oil and gas waiting to be fully tapped, although the jury is still out on the effect of the drilling processes on the environment.
All this news is bringing on a flashback to four years ago. I have to admit that in early 2008, I was still clueless as to what was about to happen to the economy. However, I drove about 20 miles each way to and from my job, so there was no way I could not notice the rapid spike in gas prices. I also remember having seen an ad for a CNN special titled “Out of Gas: We Were Warned”. I didn’t think much about it, to be honest, but the soaring gas prices were constantly reminding me of it. I didn’t have a lot of worries at first, since I was in a position where I could absorb that price increase. But I couldn’t help wondering when it was going to stop, and if this was just the beginning of something. A few years before that, I overheard some friends talking about the world’s oil supply running out in the next 30 years. Again, I was not overly worried, since my assumption was that hydrogen would replace gasoline as the main source of vehicle fuel long before oil supplies got short. But I was fully aware that I was not any kind of scientist, and I was only basing that assumption on what little I knew and had heard. Meanwhile, the price of gasoline continued to rise rapidly through the winter and into spring, so I decided to research this subject a little more on the internet.
I soon became familiar with the term “peak oil”. I was shocked by what I found, even though I realized that everything I found on the internet needed to be taken with a grain of salt. I started to wonder if my faith in science and hydrogen technology was misplaced. There were several sites warning of what was waiting ahead, their conclusion being that sometime around 2005-06, the world’s oil production hit its peak, and from there on was in terminal decline. There was no real solution, not hydrogen or anything else. The time to prepare the infrastructure of the United States for a post-peak oil world had passed, and we were now stuck with the consequences. The impact of peak oil would hit suddenly, and without warning gas prices would skyrocket out of control, and driving a car would become unaffordable to the average person. I was just looking into one side of the story, but it seemed to confirm my suspicion that some kind of a structural shift had occurred, and that there was more than just worldwide demand, but also diminishing supply behind the unprecedented spike in gas prices.
I learned something else while I was researching peak oil. I found that there was a vast reserve of shale oil right under the United States. The possibility of tapping into this oil was dismissed by most peak oil doomers. They pointed to a concept I learned called EROEI (Energy Returned On Energy Invested). According to what I read, getting the oil from the ground would actually use more energy than what could be produced from the oil being extracted. However, I don’t remember any mention being made of the process known as “fracking”. If I remember right, most of the peak oil articles I read were from around 2005-06, right around the time of the technological breakthrough called hydraulic fracturing, for which fracking is a shorthand name. So I wasn’t aware that even as I was reading those articles on peak oil, the Bakken shale boom in North Dakota may well have already been underway.
I have never been anywhere near North Dakota, so I can’t in any way speak about it from experience. And I still don’t have a thorough knowledge of the Bakken shale boom, other than the news clippings I’ve seen. But one thing I do know is that North Dakota has jobs in abundance where they are scarce just about everywhere else. Some of the numbers I have read are unbelievable, including fast food workers making $20 an hour. The major disadvantage of course is that North Dakota is hardly the most desirable place to live. Subzero midday temperatures are not uncommon during this time of year, and the vast monotonous terrain is also likely to be unappealing to most people. Added to all this is the lack of adequate housing to handle the huge influx of job seekers. There are small dwelling units going up rapidly, but those who can’t find housing either have to risk their lives by sleeping in their cars in polar conditions or stay in the extremely expensive hotels and motels. There doesn’t seem to be much there for anyone looking for excitement. Since Williston seems to be the largest boom town, I decided to do a simple scan on Google Maps and on Flickr. It looks like just a small town in the middle of a vast, endless prairie. There may be something of water sports enthusiasts, since it lies near the Missouri River. The Rocky Mountains may also be within a few hours drive. North Dakota is obviously thousands of miles away from either coast, and the nearest large body of water is the Great Lakes.
With all that is going on in North Dakota, I am wondering about what will happen where I live, in Pennsylvania. I live in the Philadelphia area, which does not lie above the Marcellus shale deposits in the Central and Western parts of the state, but of course is much closer to those regions than to North Dakota, and maybe the Marcellus shale boom will rub off on our area. I don’t know how economically tied in we are with other regions of the state, but I think we could benefit in some way. There has been much speculation and hope, but now, in just the last few days, I have been hearing news that the boom may not be as big as expected. There are reports that the number of actual jobs created was exaggerated, and also that Chesapeake, one of the largest companies, is shifting its investment away from the “dry” gas areas such as Central Pennsylvania, and toward the liquid gases that lie more to the western part of the state and in Eastern Ohio. The hydraulic fracturing practices have apparently produced a glut of dry natural gas, which will likely remain cheap for years. Now, the operations have shifted to the more profitable liquid gas to the west.
I didn’t watch the annual State of the Union address last night. For things like that, I prefer to get a recap on the internet or in the newspaper. But President Obama made sure to tout the energy boom, and the impact it is having. It is giving me some hope. Maybe this is the light at the end of the tunnel. Maybe it can be exported and go a long way to erase the huge trade deficits we have been facing. Maybe it can take a huge bite out of the high unemployment in this country. It has already greatly reduced our dependence on foreign energy. All I can do is hope that time will prove these hopes to be justified.